Worship

Worship, is it a drama? Is it singing a few songs and a lesson we call a sermon? Is worship about connecting with our emotions or with our intellect? Should the service be full of spontaneity or order? Should it be simple or ornate? What is the place of tradition? As I think through these issues I find myself drawn to diverse parts of traditions and innovations. I love to see the Word of God respected by having an Old Testament lesson, an New Testament lesson and a Psalm. If we read it responsively, that sounds good. But I enjoy innovation of bringing in drama teams and slide projection too. The article in Leadership Journal called Richer Blend written by Bob Kauflin tells a similar urge by the author to combine tradition and innovation. He comes from a charismatic church and so his challenge is to take a spontaneous style of worship and put some structure to it. I am not sure I am in the same place but I have gone to those sorts of churches. I believe my current challenge is more on connecting with God in worship. For me the structure is too functional and not enough warmth or engagement of the eternal. While I feel this, I don't know that the fault necessarily falls on others, but on myself. Do I come to worship ill prepared to meet God?

Comments

Unknown said…
To me, worship is about remembering Christ in His way. Maybe it's my Roman Catholic upbringing but it feels a little incomplete in my Lutheran services when we don't share communion to remember Him. Reading old and new testament lessons does help us to learn and remember His upbringing as a Jew and how His life brought us a new covenant -- one new commandment over all others -- so that's good. Doing so in the community of fellow worshipers, sharing their joys and concerns, in the manner that's culturally customary to them helps to see each other as brethren, so that's good too, except when we are not as culturally diverse as His people should be.
11:00 PM
Lisa Smartt said…
I appreciate the discussion, Terry. Phil and I discuss the subject of worship often as part of a small church plant here (Reformed Baptist). To me, the great irony of life is that those of us who are so seemingly "intent on the Word", "Reformed" and focused on Biblical readings...are often the very ones who seem so lifeless in it. On the other hand, friends who worship in a more "enthusiastic" manner seem sometimes tempted to forget that the Word itself has POWER, even when it's free of cultural or personal additions. Do we trust the power of our "creativity in worship" or the power of the perfection of the WORD? With that said (and this almost seems scandalous to say in some Reformed cirles) God gave us emotion and feelings. We have the ability to feel...and that's a good thing. There IS a place where the absolute perfection of the Word and the power of emotion combine in perfect compatible balance. I can hardly wait for heaven.
12:07 PM
pruittcommunications said…
I miss the days at Brother Way's church in Huntington. But still I am not willing to go back there. I want both emotion and mind engaged. I think it what is meant by worship the Lord with all your heart, soul and might. Hope we get this trip to TN pulled off. It seems like it is coming together for Barb.
7:35 PM
Lisa Smartt said…
It has been years since I've thought of the church in Huntington. I too have no interest in going back to "those days." I like the straight forward study of the word and Christ. Looking back at my time at Bethel, I rejoice that we all experienced such joy together and such wild and wooly all-out zealous passion for Christ. I would never call those years "wasted" in the way some college years are wasted. However, with that said, I'm surprised God didn't strike us dead for our haughty sense of "we found the truth" and our youthful legalism which saw the devil behind every tree. I rather like the spiritual period of my mid-40's which allows me to enjoy a good margarita and an Eagles CD. At the same time, I hope that my genuine love for Christ and others has deepened...and that the sense of being a "fellow traveler" has removed some of the pride and offense of my younger days.
2:48 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A lion, a rooster, a billy-goat and Tommy Franks go to a bar...

Image
Three things are stately in their tread; four are stately in their stride: the lion, which is mightiest among beasts and does not turn back before any; the strutting rooster, the he-goat, and a king whose army is with him. ---Proverbs 30:29-31 (ESV) Different creatures in nature have different glories. A rooster is a glorious thing to see. He is proud of his feathers and his position. A lion knows he is a beast to be feared. A rooster would be no challenge for a lion though. A he-goat is no challenge for a lion, though he also is proud of his position and strength. When we think of a lion we think of an animal dangerous and to be feared. But in a sense, a general (king) with his troops who are equipped for battle find no match in a lion. This is especially true if we are talking about a modern general with attack helicopters, snipers, artillery, tanks and well trained troops. We all have our own gifting and glory. The glory may be small or large. One may be a
Read more

Celtic Words In English

I once heard a lecturer say that English was made up at its heart three languages; Anglo-Saxon (A Germanic tongue), French (influence from William the Conquerer A.D. 1066), and Latin (from the church and scholars). She also mentioned that Celtic had been the language of England before the influence of the Anglo-Saxons and some “tie together words” had been brought into English. I assumed she meant words which tie sentences together, or nouns. But I was not sure which words she meant in particular. So I did a little research to find out what those relics in our language are. It seems that Celtic has few words surviving in English. I'm not counting the Celtic words which came in through other languages such as French. I'm not sure that there is a definitive list of Celtic words in English but here are a few I found in various places on the Internet and a book I have. ass (borrowed earlier by the Celts from the Latin asinus) bannock bard blarney bucket car cart clock coll
Read more

Was the New Testament Letters Only Written to Male Brothers?

  Question:   Was the Bible written to men only and not to women?   Some teach that the New Testament letters address brothers exclusively.      Executive Summary Answer:   Women and men share in the blessings of the gospel, Scripture was written for both women and men. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. (Gen. 1:27 ESV) Answer:   The Bible recognizes differences between genders but also recognizes the commonality between male and female genders.   The book of Proverbs is written to sons to gain wisdom.   “Hear, my son, your father's instruction, and forsake not your mother's teaching, for they are a graceful garland for your head and pendants for your neck.”   (Prov. 1:8-9 ESV) The book of Proverbs was written in order to teach young men wisdom.   Even so, often it is the female gender that teaches wisdom.   Early in the book, the male gender, a son, is to embrace the teaching from a member of the
Read more